JCCS Academic Language Assessment Week -31 Vandalism

I think it should be a yes and a no.Because sayv like if it is a young child and he/she is not even in their teens then their parents should be held accountable.But say that their child is older and that they know what they are doing but they get in trouble then he/she would be accountable because they probably wanted to show off for their friends and now they have to go to a class that talks about how they can ACHIEVE their life time.According to the article parents needs to be responsible for their child at all cost.But vandlism at a teen age should be held as a crime.This shows that the parent should punish their child if they destroyed something.This also show that the parents should keep a close eye on their kids so the parents won't have to pay a cost.According to the link I found parents have COMPUTE to pay the price because most of the time the crime is made by teenagers.This also shows that the parents have to be SPECIFIC about the  price to see if they want to pay or the kid  can take a class.